참고자료

[GMO] 라운드업 레디 유전자조작 작물의 수많은 부정적 영향 발견

로버트 크레머(Robert Kremer)는 미 농무부 농업연구부 소속 미생물학자이며, 미주리대학의 외래교수(adjunct professor)입니다. 그는 유럽농학회지(The European Journal of Agronomy) 2009년 10월호에 라운드업 레디 유전자조작 작물((RR GM crop)에 광범위하게 사용되고 있는 라운드업 제초제의 부정적 영향을 보고한 논문의 공동저자 중의 한명입니다.

Glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crop interactions with rhizosphere microorganisms
European Journal of Agronomy, Volume 31, Issue 3, October 2009, Pages 153-161
Robert J. Kremer, Nathan E. Means

Glyphosate interactions with physiology, nutrition, and diseases of plants: Threat to agricultural sustainability?
European Journal of Agronomy, Volume 31, Issue 3, October 2009, Pages 111-113
Tsuioshi Yamada, Robert J. Kremer, Paulo Roberto de Camargo e Castro, Bruce W. Wood

그는 1997년부터 몬산토사의 라운드업 제초제의 기본 성분인 글리포세이트(glyphosate)의 영향에 대한 연구를 수행해오고 있습니다.(인터뷰 내용에 따르면, 그는 1997년부터 라운드업 레디 콩(유전자조작 콩 종자)을 새롭게 도입한 이후 선충(nematodes)의 생산에 변화가 있는지를 연구했다고 하는데, 유전자조작을 시행한 라운드업 레디 품종의 콩과 옥수수에서 곰팡이균(fungi)이 증가하는 것을 발견했다고 합니다. 또한 미주리주에서 8종의 그리포세이트 내성 잡초를 발견했다고 합니다.)

다음은 [유기농 및 비유전자조작 보고서(The Organic & Non-GMO Report)]에서 로버트 크레머(Robert Kremer)를 인터뷰한 내용입니다. 미 농무부는 그가 연구에 참여한 라운드업 제초제의 부정적 영향을 밝혀낸 5편의 논문을 공표하는 것을 꺼려하고 있다고 합니다.

다음은 로버트 크레머(Robert Kremer) 인터뷰 전문입니다.

=======================================


Scientist finding many negative impacts of Roundup Ready GM crops

Friday, 08 January 2010 13:52
http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/jan10/scientists_find_negative_impacts_of_GM_crops.php

USDA doesn’t want to publicize studies showing negative impacts

Robert Kremer is a microbiologist with the US Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service and an adjunct professor in the Division of Plant Sciences at the University of Missouri. He is co-author of one of five papers published in the October 2009 issue of The European Journal of Agronomy that found negative impacts of Roundup herbicide, which is used extensively with Roundup Ready genetically modified crops. Kremer has been studying the impacts of glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, since 1997.

The Organic & Non-GMO Report interviewed Mr. Kremer about his research and the reluctance of the USDA to publicize the findings of the five papers.

Please give me an overview of your research

RK: We started in 1997 wanting to see if this new system, Roundup Ready, would change the production of nematodes in soybean. We started looking at organisms in soybean roots and saw microorganisms colonizing the roots. We suspected that glyphosate was having an impact. There was a root fungi problem that seemed to be encouraging sudden death syndrome (SDS).
We saw the increase of these fungi in the Roundup Ready (genetically modified) system, both soybeans and corn.

What types of things are you seeing in the Roundup Ready system?
RK: This system is altering the whole soil biology. We are seeing differences in bacteria in plant roots and changes in nutrient availability. Glyphosate is very systemic in the plant and is being released through the roots into the soil. Many studies show that glyphosate can have toxic effects on microorganisms and can stimulate them to germinate spores and colonize root systems. Other researchers are showing that glyphosate can immobilize manganese, an essential plant micronutrient.

What are glyphosate’s impacts on beneficial soil bacteria?
RK: The most obvious impact is on rhizobia, a bacterium that fixes nitrogen. It has been shown that glyphosate can be toxic to rhizobia. (Nitrogen fixing bacteria are important to soils because nitrogen is the most commonly deficient nutrient in many soils.)

What about research showing increased incidence of Fusarium in Roundup Ready GM crops?
RK: We’ve taken field surveys and seen an increase in Fusarium with the use of glyphosate. Some Roundup Ready varieties even without using glyphosate tend to be more susceptible to being impacted by Fusarium. It could be an unintended consequence of genetic manipulation that could make it more susceptible.

Your paper also mentioned the potential of glyphosate to contaminate groundwater.
RK: Yes, under certain circumstances. The big assumption for claims that glyphosate is benign is that it isn’t immediately absorbed by the soil. But research is showing that isn’t necessarily true; that it is still available in the soil.
If soil is full of phosphorous, glyphosate could leach into ground water. For example, farmers may use manure from confined animal feeding operations as a fertilizer. The soil will then contain high amounts of phosphorus, which overwhelms the soil. Any glyphosate that hits the soil will be a potential contaminant. It can stay in the soil or it might run off into streams or waterways.

What about glyphosate resistant weeds?
RK: We have eight different species of glyphosate resistant weeds in Missouri. Some species of Johnson Grass are found in fields where Roundup is used year after year. It is a very aggressive weed.
To solve the problem of weed resistance, genetic engineers are developing soybeans that tolerate Roundup and Dicamba, another herbicide. They are incorporating another gene resistant to another herbicide. When resistance happens again, will they then develop a plant resistant to five or six herbicides? It’s an illogical circle.

With so much glyphosate being used, what types of long-term impacts do you think could occur?
RK: We are already seeing glyphosate-resistant weeds. If we continue to use glyphosate in the same fields year after year, it’s a matter of time until microbial communities in the soil will shift to more detrimental species.
The use of glyphosate stimulates detrimental pathogens in the growing season but they go back down after the growing season. Eventually, they may build up in the soil and not go back down.

Are many researchers looking at the possibly negative impacts of glyphosate or Roundup Ready crops?
RK: There are a handful of researchers. There is more research looking at the production of these crops.

The papers published in the European Journal of Agronomy received no publicity in the United States. Why is that?
RK: I was working with USDA-ARS to publish a news release about these studies. I’ve gone all the way to the administrators, but they are reluctant to put something out. Their thinking is that if farmers are using this (Roundup Ready) technology, USDA doesn’t want negative information being released about it. This is how it is. I think the news release is still sitting on someone’s desk.

What about your future research?
RK: We’re looking at some methods that could be used to overcome negative effects if we continue to use Roundup Ready crops, such as supplementation of nutrients by foliar application.
I’m more interested in sustainable agriculture. More farmers are interested in using cover cropping to maintain soil quality and other organic amendments. But it’s a steep learning curve for them.

====================


Robert Kremer


Robert Kremer
출처 : 미주리대학 홈페이지
http://plantsci.missouri.edu/faculty/kremer.htm



Adjunct Professor
Division of Plant Sciences

Education
B.S., Agronomy, University of Missouri
M.S., Soil Science, University of Missouri
Ph.D., Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Mississippi State University


Description
Robert Kremer is a microbiologist with the USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality research unit. Specific research interests include assessment of microorganisms and insects for biological weed control and integration of these organisms with cultural practices such as cover cropping and allelopathy; dynamics of weed seeds in soils and interactions with soil microorganisms; weed seedling ecology and pesticide fates in soil; and impacts of transgenic crops on soil ecology and biological processes. He teaches Environmental Soil Microbiology and co-teaches Advanced Weed

댓글 남기기

이메일은 공개되지 않습니다.

다음의 HTML 태그와 속성을 사용할 수 있습니다: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>