<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>건강과 대안 &#187; 협동을 통한 우선순위</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chsc.or.kr/tag/%ed%98%91%eb%8f%99%ec%9d%84-%ed%86%b5%ed%95%9c-%ec%9a%b0%ec%84%a0%ec%88%9c%ec%9c%84/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr</link>
	<description>연구공동체</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 03:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ko-KR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap</title>
		<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=88709</link>
		<comments>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=88709#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 02:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>건강과대안</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[연구 우선 순위 선정]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[협동을 통한 우선순위]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=88709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap Cooke et al. Health Research Policy and Systems (2015) 13:25 International policy suggests [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap</p>
<p>Cooke et al. Health Research Policy and Systems (2015) 13:25</p>
<p>International policy suggests that collaborative priority setting (CPS) between researchers and end users of research should shape the research agenda, and can increase capacity to address the research-practice translational gap. There is limited research evidence to guide how this should be done to meet the needs of dynamic healthcare systems. One-off priority setting events and time-lag between decision and action prove problematic. This study illustrates the use of CPS in a UK Research collaboration called Collaboration and Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=88709/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
