<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>건강과 대안 &#187; 사료규제</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chsc.or.kr/tag/%EC%82%AC%EB%A3%8C%EA%B7%9C%EC%A0%9C/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr</link>
	<description>연구공동체</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 01:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ko-KR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[광우병] 소가 소를 잡아먹는 동종식육의 미국 사료정책</title>
		<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3271</link>
		<comments>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3271#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>건강과대안</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[광우병]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[식품 · 의약품]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[동종식육]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[미국산 쇠고기 수입]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[사료규제]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[캘리포니아]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[미국 캘리포니아&#160;광우병 발생으로 소가 소를 잡아먹는 동종식육이라 불리는&#160;소 사료에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있다는 미국 언론의 기사입니다. Mad cow: Latest episode raises questions about cattle feed The riskiest parts [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>미국 캘리포니아&nbsp;광우병 발생으로 소가 소를 잡아먹는 동종식육이라 불리는&nbsp;소 사료에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있다는 미국 언론의 기사입니다.<BR><br />
<H1 class=headline>Mad cow: Latest episode raises questions about cattle feed</H1><br />
<H2 class=subheadline>The riskiest parts of rendered cows aren’t supposed to be fed back to other cows. But they are fed to chickens, whose waste can be fed back to cattle in what one critic calls ‘cow cannibalism.’ </H2><A href="http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AtBUYaCn9yZwKYcdFvjObCS1qHQA;_ylu=X3oDMTFmaGtwZmpuBG1pdANBcnRpY2xlIEhlYWQEcG9zAzEEc2VjA01lZGlhQXJ0aWNsZUhlYWRUZW1w;_ylg=X3oDMTJwNjNxcTJqBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDMDI3ODk0NTItNDI4ZC0zOThjLWI3MmQtNzkxNWJmYjUxNjJiBHBzdGNhdAMEcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QD;_ylv=0/SIG=11d73g6uo/EXP=1336929587/**http%3A//www.csmonitor.com/" rel=nofollow><IMG class=logo title="" alt="Christian Science Monitor" src="http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/9wbaEXbcXRRDysfz1j3RkA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9Zml0O2g9Mjc-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/logo/csmonitor/csm_logo_115.jpg"></A><CITE class="byline vcard">By <SPAN class=fn>Brad Knickerbocker</SPAN> | <SPAN class="provider org">Christian Science Monitor</SPAN>&nbsp;<BR><BR><A href="http://news.yahoo.com/mad-cow-latest-episode-raises-questions-cattle-feed-202256317.html;_ylt=A2KJjbyhd51P7moAMrLQtDMD">http://news.yahoo.com/mad-cow-latest-episode-raises-questions-cattle-feed-202256317.html;_ylt=A2KJjbyhd51P7moAMrLQtDMD</A><BR><br />
<P class=first>There appears to be no risk to humans from the dairy cow discovered in California this week to have “<SPAN id=lw_1335694864_6 class=yshortcuts>mad cow</SPAN>” disease. That’s according to the <SPAN id=lw_1335694864_0 class=yshortcuts>US Department of Agriculture</SPAN> and the <SPAN id=lw_1335694864_2 class=yshortcuts>beef industry</SPAN>.</P><br />
<P>“It is important to reiterate that this animal was never presented for slaughter for human consumption, did not enter food supply channels, and at no time presented any risk to human health,” the USDA said in a statement this week.</P><br />
<P>But the case involving a 10 year-old Holstein&nbsp;raises questions about how such cattle themselves are fed, which critics say could be part of a dangerous cycle.</P><br />
<P>RECOMMENDED:&nbsp;Six major food recalls</P><br />
<P>Mad cow, known scientifically as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is believed to be carried by <SPAN id=lw_1335694864_4 class=yshortcuts>animal feed</SPAN> made from cattle brains or spinal cord. Such feed is now banned in the US and other countries, but cases of BSE have continued to appear around the world.</P><br />
<P>The World Health Organization&nbsp;has called for the exclusion of the riskiest tissues (eyes and intestines as well as brains and spinal cord) from all animal feed to protect against the spread of <SPAN id=lw_1335694864_1 class=yshortcuts>mad cow disease</SPAN>.</P><br />
<P>Stanley Prusiner, who received the 1997 Nobel Prize in Medicine for discovering the protein associated with BSE has said the US should ban poultry waste in cattle feed as well.</P><br />
<P>“Unfortunately, the United States&nbsp;still allows the feeding of some of these potentially risky tissues to people, pigs, pets, poultry, and&nbsp;fish,” warns Michael Greger, director of public health and animal agriculture at The <SPAN id=lw_1335694864_5 class=yshortcuts>Humane Society of the United States</SPAN>.</P><br />
<P>“Cattle remains are still fed to chickens, for example, and the poultry litter (floor wastes that include the feces and spilled feed) is fed back to cows,” he writes on his Huffington Post blog. “In this way, prions – the infectious proteins that cause mad cow disease – may continue to be cycled back into cattle feed and complete the cow ‘cannibalism’ circuit blamed for the spread of the disease.”</P><br />
<P>Part of the problem, according to critics, is that only a tiny fraction of slaughtered cows (40,000 out of 35 million a year) are tested for BSE.</P><br />
<P>In this week’s instance, the cow (which was to be rendered into products other than meat for human consumption) had been unable to stand – a “downer” cow. This raised suspicions, so the cow was tested for BSE. This showed that the current inspection system works, say beef industry supporters.</P><br />
<P>According to the USDA, the infected animal discovered this week had “atypical BSE,” which means it most likely did not get the disease from eating infected <SPAN id=lw_1335694864_3 class=yshortcuts>cattle feed</SPAN>. Still, the USDA is tracking feed sources as a possible cause.</P><br />
<P>This instance of BSE in US cattle has caused some international ripples.</P><br />
<P>Indonesia suspended its imports of US beef Thursday, two major South Korean retailers pulled US beef from their stores this week, and South Korea&#8217;s agriculture ministry has stepped up inspections of US beef and requested detailed information on the case. Taiwan’s Department of Health is seeking permission from US authorities to visit slaughterhouses in the US, Taiwanese officials said Saturday.</P><br />
<P>&#8220;We will lift the ban as soon as the US can assure us its dairy cows are free of mad cow disease,&#8221; Indonesia&#8217;s Vice Agriculture Minister Rusman Heriawan told reporters.</P><br />
<P>&#8220;It could be one month or one year,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It depends on how long it takes to resolve this case.&#8221;</P><br />
<P>BSE is fatal to cows, and eating tainted meat has been linked to a similar disease in humans known as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease&nbsp;(vCJD).</P><br />
<P>Prior to this week, there were three confirmed cases of BSE in&nbsp;cows&nbsp;in the US – in a Canadian-born&nbsp;cow&nbsp;in 2003 in&nbsp;Washington State, in 2005 in&nbsp;Texas, and in 2006 in Alabama.</P><br />
<P>RECOMMENDED:&nbsp;Six major food recalls</P></CITE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3271/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[식품안전] 스웨덴, 돼지에게 돼지를 먹이는 동종식육방식 비판</title>
		<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=2057</link>
		<comments>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=2057#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>건강과대안</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[광우병]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[식품 · 의약품]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pig cannibalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[돼지 동종식육]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[사료규제]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[스웨덴]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[에스킬 에르란드쏜(Eskil Erlandsson)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[육골분 사료]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[에스킬 에르란드쏜(Eskil Erlandsson) 스웨덴 농무장관이 돼지 사료에 돼지의 피나 지방을 사용하는 동종식육 방식(pig cannibalism)이 유럽에서 합법적인 사실에 대해 비판했다는 소식입니다.광우병의 발생 원인 중 하나로 소에게 동종식육 방식의 육골분 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>에스킬 에르란드쏜(Eskil Erlandsson) 스웨덴 농무장관이 돼지 사료에 돼지의 피나 지방을 사용하는 동종식육 방식(pig cannibalism)이 유럽에서 합법적인 사실에 대해 비판했다는 소식입니다.<BR><BR>광우병의 발생 원인 중 하나로 소에게 동종식육 방식의 육골분 사료를 투여했기 때문이라는 주장이 제기된 바 있듯이&#8230; 돼지를 동종식육 방식으로 사육하는 것에 대해서도 우려가 제기되고 있습니다.<BR><BR>이번에 스웨덴 농무장관이 돼지 동종식육 방식을 비판한 것은 덴마크의 Daka사가 돼지의 피와 지방을 원료로 돼지사료를 만든다는 사실을 알게 되었으며,&nbsp;스웨덴의 축산기업 Scan사가 덴마크의&nbsp;&nbsp;Daka사 주식을 일정부분 소유하고 있기 때문이라고 합니다.<BR><BR>Scan사를 비롯한 스웨덴 축산업계는&nbsp;이러한 동종식육 방식에 동의하지 않는다는군요.<BR><BR>현재 유럽에서는 돼지에게 돼지의 피나 지방을 먹이는 동종식육 방식(pig cannibalism)이 합법화 되어 있습니다. 물론 한국과 미국에서도 이러한 사육방식은 널리 유행하고 있고, 합법화되어 있습니다.<BR><BR>==============================================<BR><br />
<H1>Sweden condemns pig cannibalism</H1><br />
<DIV class=tyda><!-- Article Start --><br />
<P class=small><SPAN>출처 : <SPAN class=url><STRONG><FONT color=#008000>The Local</FONT></STRONG></SPAN>&nbsp; Published: 22 Jun 10 17:00 CET<BR><A href="http://www.thelocal.se/27392/20100622/">http://www.thelocal.se/27392/20100622/</A><BR><BR></P><br />
<P><SPAN>However, across Europe, pigs can still be legally fed with feed containing pig blood, disgusting Agriculture Minister Eskil Erlandsson, who called it &#8220;shocking.&#8221;<BR><BR></SPAN><br />
<DIV><SPAN>Erlandsson reacted after learning that a Danish producer part-owned by Swedish meat producer Scan makes pig feed that contains pig blood, among other ingredients.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>&#8220;It is ethically objectionable to eat one&#8217;s own species,&#8221; he said.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>Following the mad cow disease crisis in the 1990s, meat and bone meal were banned as feed for pigs, cows and chickens. Cannibalism was cited as a reason for the spread of mad cow disease, officially known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>However, across Europe, pigs can now be fed entirely legally with feed containing pig blood and fat, Sveriges Radio&#8217;s news bulletin Ekot reported on Tuesday.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>In Sweden, Scan and other large meat producers have agreed not to use blood or animal fat in animal feed for pigs, among others. However, Scan is part-owner of Danish company Daka, which produces pig feed based on pig blood and fat.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>Scan&#8217;s communications director Margaretha Thorngren thinks that it is unethical if to give pigs animal feed derived from their own species and now wants to see a change.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>Leo Virta, head of marketing at Daka, told Ekot that the blood and fat processing is so refined at the plant that it is something completely different than the pigs for meat and bone meal.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN>&#8220;Strictly speaking, one can say that there has been an industrial version of a natural raw material that becomes natural again,&#8221; he said.</SPAN> </DIV><br />
<P></P><!-- Article End --><!-- Author Start --><br />
<DIV class=author><br />
<P>TT/The Local (<A href="mailto:news@thelocal.se">news@thelocal.se</A>/08 656 6518)</P></DIV><br />
<P class=small><BR></SPAN></P></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=2057/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[광우병] FDA urged to ban feeding of chicken feces to cattle</title>
		<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=1225</link>
		<comments>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=1225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>건강과대안</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[광우병]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[식품 · 의약품]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poultry litter to cattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[공익과학센터]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[교차오염]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[닭 분뇨 사료]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[사료규제]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[소비자연맹]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=1225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FDA urged to ban feeding of chicken feces to cattleFood and consumer groups say the practice increases the risk of cattle becoming infected with mad cow disease. A [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P>FDA urged to ban feeding of chicken feces to cattle<BR><BR>Food and consumer groups say the practice increases the risk of cattle becoming infected with mad cow disease. A beef industry trade group say a ban isn&#8217;t needed.<BR><BR>By Jerry Hirsch<BR>&nbsp;<BR>출처 : LA타임즈 October 31, 2009<BR><A href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-feed31-2009oct31,0,1227725.story?track=rss">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-feed31-2009oct31,0,1227725.story?track=rss</A><BR><BR>A fight is brewing over the practice of feeding chicken feces and other poultry farm waste to cattle. </P><br />
<P>A coalition of food and consumer groups that includes Consumers Union and the Center for Science in the Public Interest has asked the Food and Drug Administration to ban the practice. McDonald&#8217;s Corp., the nation&#8217;s largest restaurant user of beef, also wants the FDA to prohibit the feeding of so-called poultry litter to cattle.</P><br />
<P>Members of the coalition are threatening to file a lawsuit or to push for federal legislation establishing such a ban if the FDA doesn&#8217;t act to do so in the coming months. </P><br />
<P>Farmers feed 1 million to 2 million tons of poultry litter to their cattle annually, according to FDA estimates. </P><br />
<P>Using the litter &#8212; which includes feces, spilled chicken feed, feathers and poultry farm detritus &#8212; increases the risk of cows becoming infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, said Michael Hansen, a senior scientist at Consumers Union.</P><br />
<P>That&#8217;s because the spilled chicken feed and the feces contain tissue from ruminants &#8212; cows and sheep, among other mammals. The disease is transmitted through feeding ruminant remains to cattle. </P><br />
<P>&#8220;It takes a very small quantity of ruminant protein, even just 1 milligram, to cause an infection,&#8221; said Steve Roach, public health program director with Food Animal Concerns Trust, a Chicago-based animal welfare group that is part of the coalition.</P><br />
<P>Although it is rare, people can contract a fatal form of the disease by eating meat from cows with BSE.</P><br />
<P>The National Cattlemen&#8217;s Beef Assn., the beef industry&#8217;s main trade group, said the ban was not needed and that several FDA reviews had determined that the chance of cattle becoming infected with mad cow disease from eating poultry litter was remote.</P><br />
<P>&#8220;Science does not justify the ban, and the FDA has looked at this now many times,&#8221; said Elizabeth Parker, chief veterinarian for the trade group. </P><br />
<P>Parker noted that the FDA this year banned the use of certain types of tissue from any form of animal feed, even that eaten by chickens. Those tissues include brain, spinal cord material and other high-risk tissues where the pathogens believed to cause mad cow disease typically are found. The tissue ban greatly reduces chances that prions, implicated in mad cow, can find their way into the food chain, Parker said. She also said the disease was not a threat to public health.</P><br />
<P>&#8220;We have tested 800,000 cattle in recent years and have not found any evidence of BSE circulating in the herd,&#8221; Parker said.</P><br />
<P>But others remain concerned.</P><br />
<P>&#8220;I still think you need to totally restrict using any ruminant protein in feed that gets back to ruminants,&#8221; said Linda Detwiler, a food safety consultant and former U.S. Department of Agriculture veterinarian.</P><br />
<P>Prohibiting high-risk tissues as a feed source makes the chances of transmitting mad cow disease through poultry litter low but does not remove all risk, Detwiler said.</P><br />
<P>The practice also makes McDonald&#8217;s, one of the nation&#8217;s biggest beef purchasers, nervous. &#8220;We do not condone the feeding of poultry litter to cattle,&#8221; it said in a statement. </P><br />
<P>The issue has kicked around since the first U.S. case of mad cow disease was discovered almost six years ago in an animal imported from Canada. There have been two known indigenous cases of mad cow infections in domestic cattle since then, but both were in animals born before the enactment of stricter regulation of feed.</P><br />
<P>Generally, the FDA has left the decision on whether to feed cattle poultry litter up to state regulators. California allows the practice with one exception: Poultry litter is banned in feed for lactating dairy cows. </P><br />
<P>In 2004, the FDA announced its intention to prohibit the use of poultry litter in cattle feed, but after reviewing the proposed ban decided against it. The agency said its rules prohibiting the use of high-risk tissues in all animal feed were sufficient to keep mad cow pathogens from reaching poultry feed. The FDA also said there was little risk to human or cattle health from the other components of poultry litter.</P><br />
<P>&#8220;With respect to pathogenic microorganisms, drug residues and contaminants in poultry litter, FDA is not aware of any data showing that the use of poultry litter in cattle feed is posing human or animal health risks that warrant restrictions on its use,&#8221; the agency said. </P><br />
<P>But Hansen, the Consumers Union scientist, said that besides the mad cow risk, the feed can contain disease-causing bacteria, antibiotics and even foreign objects such as dead rodents, rocks, nails and glass. </P><br />
<P>Such hazards are not eliminated by any processing of the feed that might occur, he said. </P><br />
<P>Feeding farm animals feces may sound gross, but it goes back to the dawn of animal agriculture, said Dean Cliver, professor emeritus of food safety at UC Davis. </P><br />
<P>&#8220;In the old days when people had mixed farms, what came out the back end of the cows was eaten by pigs, and what came out the end of pigs was eaten by chickens. That was the natural way of farming,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Anything that hit the ground was fair game.&#8221;</P><br />
<P><A href="mailto:jerry.hirsch@latimes.com">jerry.hirsch@latimes.com</A></P><br />
<P>twitter.com/latimesjerry</P><br />
<P>&nbsp;</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=1225/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
