<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>건강과 대안 &#187; 농약사용량</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chsc.or.kr/tag/%EB%86%8D%EC%95%BD%EC%82%AC%EC%9A%A9%EB%9F%89/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr</link>
	<description>연구공동체</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 01:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ko-KR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[GMO] 유전자조작 미국 농업, 유럽에 비해 생산량 떨어지고 농약사용량 더 많아</title>
		<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=4166</link>
		<comments>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=4166#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>건강과대안</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[식품 · 의약품]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetically engineered crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[농약사용량]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[미국]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[생산성]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[유럽]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[유전자조작곡물]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[종다양성]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=4166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GM 작물 위주의 미국 농업이 non-GM 작물 위주의 유럽 농업에 비해 수확량(생산성)도 떨어지고, 농약사용량도 오히려 더 많으며, 종다양성도 파괴되어 지속가능하지 않다는사실을 유엔식량농업기구(FAO), 미국 농무부(USDA) 등의 통계를 통해 실증적으로 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM 작물 위주의 미국 농업이 non-GM 작물 위주의 유럽 농업에 비해 수확량(생산성)도 <BR>떨어지고, 농약사용량도 오히려 더 많으며, 종다양성도 파괴되어 지속가능하지 않다는<BR>사실을 유엔식량농업기구(FAO), 미국 농무부(USDA) 등의 통계를 통해 실증적으로 규명한<BR>연구결과가 발표되었습니다.<BR><BR>호주, 뉴질랜드, 브라질, 말레이시아 공동 연구팀은 이러한 연구결과를&nbsp;2013년 6월 14일자<BR>[International&nbsp;Journal of&nbsp; Agricultural Sustainability]<!-- /abstract content --> 지에 발표하였습니다.<BR><BR>논문 전문은 첨부파일을 보시고, 논문 개요는 아래를 참고하시기 바랍니다.<BR><BR>============<BR><BR>미국 중서부 지방과 유럽의 GM 작물과 non-GM 작물의 생산량, 농약사용량, 종다양성 비교<BR><BR>1. 생산량<BR><BR>1985년 전까지는 미국의 농업생산성이 유럽보다 앞섰으나, 1985년 이후엔 오히려 역전되어<BR>유럽의 농업생산성이 미국을 앞지르게 되었음.<BR><BR>유전자조작(GM) 곡물이 생산성이 높다는 산업계의 주장은 사실이 아님을 FAO, USDA&nbsp;등의<BR>통계로 확인하였음.<BR><BR>2. 농약사용량<BR><BR>유전자조작(GM) 곡물은 제초제 내성 작물임. GM이 도입된 이후 미국의 농약사용량은 108%<BR>증가했음. 반면 프랑스, 독일, 스위스의 농약사용량은 85~94% 감소했음.<BR><BR>3. 종다양성<BR><BR>미국에서 1994년 이후 종자 가격은 140% 증가하였음.(GM 종자는 특허 상품임) 이 기간동안<BR>그외의 농업에 투입되는 요소들의 가격은 80% 상승하였음.&nbsp;특허 종자로 인해 미국 농업의 <BR>종다양성은 협소해짐.<BR><BR><BR><BR><FONT size=5><STRONG>Sustainability and innovation in staple crop production in the US Midwest</STRONG></FONT><BR><BR><br />
<DL><br />
<DT><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/action/doSearch?action=runSearch&#038;type=advanced&#038;searchType=journal&#038;result=true&#038;prevSearch=%2Bauthorsfield%3A(Heinemann%2C+J+A)">Jack A. Heinemann</A><SUP>a</SUP><SUP>b</SUP><SUP>*</SUP>, <A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/action/doSearch?action=runSearch&#038;type=advanced&#038;searchType=journal&#038;result=true&#038;prevSearch=%2Bauthorsfield%3A(Massaro%2C+M)">Melanie Massaro</A><SUP>b</SUP><SUP>c</SUP>, <A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/action/doSearch?action=runSearch&#038;type=advanced&#038;searchType=journal&#038;result=true&#038;prevSearch=%2Bauthorsfield%3A(Coray%2C+D+S)">Dorien S. Coray</A><SUP>a</SUP><SUP>b</SUP>, <A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/action/doSearch?action=runSearch&#038;type=advanced&#038;searchType=journal&#038;result=true&#038;prevSearch=%2Bauthorsfield%3A(Agapito%5C-Tenfen%2C+S+Z)">Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen</A><SUP>b</SUP><SUP>d</SUP> &#038; <A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/action/doSearch?action=runSearch&#038;type=advanced&#038;searchType=journal&#038;result=true&#038;prevSearch=%2Bauthorsfield%3A(Wen%2C+J+D)">Jiajun Dale Wen</A><SUP>e</SUP><!-- /abstract content --> <BR><BR><br />
<DT><STRONG>DOI:</STRONG> 10.1080/14735903.2013.806408<BR><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#.UcDJUxYlwd2">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#.UcDJUxYlwd2</A><BR><BR><br />
<H2>Abstract</H2><br />
<H3 class="summationNavigation script_only" sizcache="28" sizset="9" jQuery1371619366593="179">Jump to section</H3><br />
<DIV class="summationNavigation script_only" sizcache="28" sizset="9" jQuery1371619366593="179"><br />
<UL class=sectionNav sizcache="27" sizset="75"><br />
<LI sizcache="27" sizset="75"><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#_i2" threedots="Introduction"><SPAN class=ellipsis_text>Introduction</SPAN></A><br />
<LI sizcache="27" sizset="76"><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#_i3" threedots="Materials and methods"><SPAN class=ellipsis_text>Materials and methods</SPAN></A><br />
<LI sizcache="27" sizset="77"><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#_i4" threedots="Results and discussion"><SPAN class=ellipsis_text>Results and discussion</SPAN></A><br />
<LI sizcache="27" sizset="78"><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#_i16" threedots="Conclusion"><SPAN class=ellipsis_text>Conclusion</SPAN></A><br />
<LI class=last sizcache="27" sizset="79"><A href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#_i18" threedots="Future strategies"><SPAN class=ellipsis_text>Future strategies</SPAN></A></LI></UL></DIV><br />
<DD class=last sizcache="27" sizset="79"><BR><br />
<DIV class=paragraph>An agroecosystem is constrained by environmental possibility and social choices, mainly in the form of government policies. To be sustainable, an agroecosystem requires production systems that are resilient to natural stressors such as disease, pests, drought, wind and salinity, and to human constructed stressors such as economic cycles and trade barriers. The world is becoming increasingly reliant on concentrated exporting agroecosystems for staple crops, and vulnerable to national and local decisions that affect resilience of these production systems. We chronicle the history of the United States staple crop agroecosystem of the Midwest region to determine whether sustainability is part of its design, or could be a likely outcome of existing policies particularly on innovation and intellectual property. Relative to other food secure and exporting countries (e.g. Western Europe), the US agroecosystem is not exceptional in yields or conservative on environmental impact. This has not been a trade-off for sustainability, as annual fluctuations in maize yield alone dwarf the loss of caloric energy from extreme historic blights. We suggest strategies for innovation that are responsive to more stakeholders and build resilience into industrialized staple crop production.</DIV><br />
<H3>Keywords<BR><BR>===============<BR><BR>GMO 많은 미 캐나다 유럽보다 생산성 낮아<BR><BR>한겨레 <SPAN>등록 : 2013.06.20 20:20</SPAN> <SPAN>수정 : 2013.06.20 21:20<BR><A href="http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/economy_general/592672.html">http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/economy_general/592672.html</A></SPAN><BR><BR>미국과 캐나다의 유전자조작(GM) 농산물이 그렇지 않은 유럽의 농산물보다 생산성이 오히려 더 떨어진다는 국제 연구 결과가 나왔다. 유전자조작 농산물이 생산량 증대로 세계의 식량문제를 해결할 수 있다는 기존 주장과 전면적으로 배치돼 파장이 주목된다.<br />
<P align=justify></P>오스트레일리아, 뉴질랜드, 브라질, 말레이시아의 공동연구팀은 14일 발간된 <농업 지속가능성 국제저널>(International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability)에 이러한 연구결과를 발표했다. 유전자조작 농산물 재배가 만연한 미국·캐나다와 유전자조작 농산물을 재배하지 않는 서부유럽 6개국을 비교했다.<br />
<P align=justify></P>연구팀의 분석 결과를 보면, 유전자조작 농사를 광범위하게 도입한 1986~2011년 미국의 1㏊당 옥수수 평균 생산량은 8284㎏으로 서부유럽의 평균 생산량 8289㎏보다 오히려 더 적었던 것으로 나타났다. 1961~1985년 미국의 생산량이 5437㎏으로 서부유럽보다 570㎏ 더 많았던 것과 뚜렷이 대조된다.<br />
<P align=justify></P>또 캐나다의 1㏊당 유채씨 생산량(1048㎏)은 1961~1985년 서부유럽의 2148㎏보다 1100㎏ 적은 정도에 그쳤으나, 1986~2011년에는 1700㎏ 이상으로 생산량 차이가 벌어졌다. 보고서에서 유전자조작 농산물의 상대적 생산량 감소 원인은 설명하지 않았다.<br />
<P align=justify></P>이와 함께 2007년 프랑스의 제초제 사용량이 1995년보다 6% 줄어든 데 반해 미국의 제초제 사용량은 오히려 8% 더 늘어난 것으로 나타났다. 살충제 사용량도 프랑스는 2007년에 1995년의 24% 수준으로 떨어뜨렸지만, 미국의 감소폭은 85%에 그쳤다. 미국의 유전자조작 재배 비율은 2011년에 콩 94%, 면화 94%, 옥수수 88%에 이른다. 김성훈 전 농림부 장관은 “유전자조작 농사가 단작으로 종의 다양성을 해칠 뿐 아니라 생산성도 낮아, 지속가능하지 않음을 보고서가 시사하고 있다”고 말했다.<br />
<P align=justify></P>김현대 선임기자 </H3></DD></DL></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=4166/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[GMO]  미국, 16년동안 유전자조작 곡물 재배로 농약사용량 더 늘어</title>
		<link>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3542</link>
		<comments>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3542#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>건강과대안</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[식품 · 의약품]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[글리포세이트]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[농약]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[농약사용량]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[라운드업]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[살충제]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[유전자조작 옥수수]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[유전자조작 콩]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[제초제]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[유전자조작(GM) 곡물은 농약 사용량을 감소시킨다는&#160;고장난 레코드처럼 계속 되풀이되는 주장과 정반대로 오히려 글리포세트(라운드업) 내성 잡초의 증가로 제초제의&#160;사용량이 늘어나서 실제 농약 사용량이 늘어났다는 연구결과가 나왔습니다.유기농센터(The Organic Center)의 수석 과학자인 Charles [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P><STRONG>유전자조작(GM) 곡물은 농약 사용량을 감소시킨다는&nbsp;고장난 레코드처럼 계속 되풀이되는 주장과 정반대로 오히려 글리포세트(라운드업) 내성 잡초의 증가로 제초제의&nbsp;사용량이 늘어나서 실제 농약 사용량이 늘어났다는 연구결과가 나왔습니다.<BR><BR>유기농센터(The Organic Center)의 수석 과학자인 Charles M Benbrook 박사는 미 농무부 자료를 분석하여 미국에서 1996년~2011년 16년 동안 유전자조작 곡물 재배와 살충제 사용량의 영향에 관한 연구 결과를 피어리뷰 학술지인 <Environmental Sciences Europe> 최신호에 발표했습니다.<BR><BR>Charles M Benbrook 박사는 1979년부터 미국 워싱턴 DC에서 농업정책, 과학, 규제에 관한 이슈를 다루었으며, <FONT color=#ff0000 size=2>Council for Environmental Quality, executive director of the subcommittee of the House Committee on Agriculture, and executive director of the Board on Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences <FONT color=#000000>등에서 활동했습니다.<BR></FONT></FONT></STRONG><BR><STRONG>1999년부터 지속적으로 유전자조작 곡물의&nbsp;재배와 살충제 사용량에 대한 분석을 해왔습니다. (<A href="http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/benbrook.htm">http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/benbrook.htm</A>)<BR><BR></STRONG><br />
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=405 bgColor=#f7d3f8 border=1><br />
<TBODY><br />
<TR><br />
<TD width=403><SMALL><br />
<P align=center><A href="http://gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=11696:cherry-picking-new-report-on-gm-and-pesticides"><STRONG><FONT size=2>2009 Report (3.7m pdf)</FONT></STRONG></A></SMALL><BR><SMALL><STRONG><FONT size=2>Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use: The First Thirteen Years</FONT></STRONG></SMALL></P></TD></TR><br />
<TR><br />
<TD width=403><br />
<P align=center><A href="http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/Benbrook2004.pdf"><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>2004 Report (2.8m pdf)</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></A><BR><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></P></TD></TR><br />
<TR><br />
<TD width=403><br />
<P align=center><A href="http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/Benbrook2003.pdf"><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>2003 Report (869k pdf)</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></A><BR><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Eight Years</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></P></TD></TR><br />
<TR><br />
<TD width=403><br />
<P align=center><SMALL><A href="http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/Benbrook%20corn_herb_use.pdf"><FONT size=2><STRONG>2001 Report (457k pdf)</STRONG></FONT></A><BR><FONT size=2><STRONG>Factors Shaping Trends in Corn Herbicide Use</STRONG></FONT></SMALL><BR><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>(Including Impact of Herbicide-Tolerant Corn on Herbicide Use)</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></P></TD></TR><br />
<TR><br />
<TD width=403><br />
<P align=center><A href="http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/Benbrooktroubledtimesfinal-exsum.pdf"><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>2001 Report (458k pdf)</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></A><BR><SMALL><FONT size=2><STRONG>Troubled Times Amid Commercial Success for Roundup Ready Soybeans<BR>Glyphosate Efficacy is Slipping and Unstable Transgene Expression Erodes Plant Defenses and Yields (Executive Summary)</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></P></TD></TR><br />
<TR><br />
<TD width=403><FONT face="Times New Roman"><I><br />
<P align=center></I></FONT><A href="http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/BenbrookRR_yield_drag_98.pdf"><SMALL><FONT face=굴림 size=2><STRONG>1999 Report (280k pdf)</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></A><BR><SMALL><FONT face=굴림 size=2><STRONG>Evidence of the Magnitude and Consequences of the Roundup Ready Soybean Yield Drag from University-Based Varietal Trials in 1998</STRONG></FONT></SMALL></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR><STRONG>=============<BR>* <FONT size=5>미국에서 1996–2011년 16년 동안 유전자조작 곡물의 살충제 사용 영향</FONT><BR><BR>1996~2011년 16년 동안 미국에서 제초제 내성 작물 재배로 인한 제초제 사용량은&nbsp;2억3900만kg&nbsp;증가하였으며, Bt 곡물은 살충제 사용량을 5600만kg 감소시켰다.&nbsp; 따라서 농약사용량은 1억8300만 kg&nbsp;늘어났다.(증가율 7%)<BR><BR>이러한 증가율을 유전자조작 옥수수와 콩에 사용하는&nbsp; 2,4-D의 사용량에 적용해보면, 농약&nbsp; 2,4-D 농약&nbsp;사용량이 50%나 증가했음을 알&nbsp;수 있다. <BR><BR>===============<BR><BR><FONT color=#ee22cc size=4>Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. &#8212; the first sixteen years</FONT><BR><BR>출처 : Environmental Sciences Europe 2012, 24:24 doi:10.1186/2190-4715-24-24<BR>Charles M Benbrook (</STRONG><A href="mailto:cbenbrook@wsu.edu"><STRONG>cbenbrook@wsu.edu</STRONG></A><STRONG>)</STRONG></P><br />
<P><A href="http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/2190-4715-24-24.pdf"><STRONG>http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/2190-4715-24-24.pdf</STRONG></A><STRONG>&nbsp; (원문 첨부파일)<BR><BR>Abstract<BR><BR>Background<BR><BR>Genetically engineered, herbicide-resistant and insect-resistant crops have been remarkable commercial successes in the United States. Few independent studies have calculated their impacts on pesticide use per hectare or overall pesticide use, or taken into account the impact of rapidly spreading glyphosate-resistant weeds. A model was developed to quantify by crop and year the impacts of six major transgenic pest-management traits on pesticide use in the U.S. over the 16-year period, 1996–2011: herbicide-resistant corn, soybeans, and cotton; Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn targeting the European corn borer; Bt corn for corn rootworms; and Bt cotton for Lepidopteron insects.<BR><BR>Results<BR><BR>Herbicide-resistant crop technology has led to a 239 million kilogram (527 million pound)<BR>increase in herbicide use in the United States between 1996 and 2011, while Bt crops have<BR>reduced insecticide applications by 56 million kilograms (123 million pounds). Overall,<BR>pesticide use increased by an estimated 183 million kgs (404 million pounds), or about 7%.<BR><BR>Conclusions<BR><BR>Contrary to often-repeated claims that today’s genetically-engineered crops have, and are<BR>reducing pesticide use, the spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds in herbicide-resistant weed management systems has brought about substantial increases in the number and volume of herbicides applied. If new genetically engineered forms of corn and soybeans tolerant of 2,4-D are approved, the volume of 2,4-D sprayed could drive herbicide usage upward by another approximate 50%. The magnitude of increases in herbicide use on herbicide-resistant hectares has dwarfed the reduction in insecticide use on Bt crops over the past 16 years, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.<BR></STRONG></P><br />
<P>=====================<BR><BR>New US Study Shows GM Crops Increase Use of Herbicides<BR><BR></P><br />
<P class=date sizset="12" sizcache09016182573391507="13" jQuery17105684093417750424="130">October 2, 2012 <SPAN sizset="12" sizcache09016182573391507="13" jQuery17105684093417750424="131"><EM>in </EM><A title="View all posts in Sustainable Agriculture" href="http://sustainablepulse.com/pulse/pulse-news/pulse-news-sustainable-agriculture/" rel="category tag" jQuery17105684093417750424="132"><EM><FONT color=#406a15>Sustainable Agriculture</FONT></EM></A></SPAN>, by <A title=henry href="http://sustainablepulse.com/members-area/henry/" jQuery17105684093417750424="133"><FONT color=#406a15>henry</FONT></A> <SPAN class="post-utility alignright" sizset="14" sizcache09016182573391507="13" jQuery17105684093417750424="134"><A class="ishare btn btn-mini btn-info" title="New US Study Shows GM Crops Increase Use of Herbicides" jQuery17105684093417750424="135">Share with</A> </SPAN></P><br />
<DIV class="entry hover" sizset="0" sizcache09016182573391507="223" jQuery17105684093417750424="136"><br />
<P class="" sizset="0" sizcache09016182573391507="223" jQuery17105684093417750424="137">The <A class="" href="http://gmoevidence.org/prof-charles-benbrook-gm-crops-increase-herbicide-use/" target=_blank jQuery17105684093417750424="138" _onclick="javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','outbound-article','http://gmoevidence.org']);"><FONT color=#406a15>latest study published</FONT></A> by Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook finds that the use of herbicides in the production of three genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops — cotton, soybeans and corn — has actually increased. This counterintuitive finding is based on an exhaustive analysis of publicly available data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agriculture Statistics Service. Benbrook’s analysis is the first peer-reviewed, published estimate of the impacts of genetically engineered (GE) herbicide-resistant (HT) crops on pesticide use.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="139">Dr. Charles Benbrook, research professor, WSU Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources. Photo courtesy Washington State University. Click image to download hi-resolution version.</P><br />
<P class=hover jQuery17105684093417750424="140">In the study, which appeared in the the open-access, peer-reviewed journal “Environmental Sciences Europe,” Benbrook writes that the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds is strongly correlated with the upward trajectory in herbicide use. Marketed as Roundup and other trade names, glyphosate is a broad-spectrum systemic herbicide used to kill weeds. Approximately 95 percent of soybean and cotton acres, and over 85 percent of corn, are planted to varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="141">“Resistant weeds have become a major problem for many farmers reliant on GE crops, and are now driving up the volume of herbicide needed each year by about 25 percent,” Benbrook said.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="142">The annual increase in the herbicides required to deal with tougher-to-control weeds on cropland planted to GE cultivars has grown from 1.5 million pounds in 1999 to about 90 million pounds in 2011.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="143">Herbicide-tolerant crops worked extremely well in the first few years of use, Benbrook’s analysis shows, but over-reliance may have led to shifts in weed communities and the spread of resistant weeds that force farmers to increase herbicide application rates (especially glyphosate), spray more often, and add new herbicides that work through an alternate mode of action into their spray programs.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="144">This latest study again rocks the GMO industry following on as it does from the recent study out of France showing that Roundup and GM maize could cause cancer.</P><br />
<H4 jQuery17105684093417750424="145">Major Findings</H4><br />
<P jQuery17105684093417750424="146">Herbicide-tolerant and Bt-transgenic crops now dominant U.S. agriculture, accounting for about one in every two acres of harvested cropland, and around 95% of soybean and cotton acres, and over 85% of corn acres.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="147">Over the first six years of commercial use (1996-2001), HT and Bt crops reduced pesticide use by 31 million pounds, or by about 2%, compared to what it likely would have been in the absence of GE crops.</P><br />
<P jQuery17105684093417750424="148">Bt crops have reduced insecticide use by 10-12 million pounds annually over the last decade. From 1996-2011, Bt crops have reduced insecticide use on the three crops by 123 million pounds, or about 28%.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="149">The annual per acre reduction in insecticide use on acres planted to Bt corn and cotton has trended downward since 1996, because of the shift toward lower-dose insecticides and the expansion of Bt corn onto acres that would not likely be treated with an insecticide.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="150">The relatively recent emergence and spread of insect populations resistant to the Bt toxins expressed in Bt corn and cotton has started to increase insecticide use, and will continue to do so in response to recommendations from entomologists to preserve the efficacy of Bt technology by applying insecticides previously displaced by the planting of Bt crops.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="151">Herbicide-tolerant crops worked extremely well in the first few years of use, but over-reliance led to shifts in weed communities and the emergence of resistant weeds that have, together, forced farmers to incrementally –</P><br />
<UL class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="152"><br />
<LI class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="153">Increase herbicide application rates (especially glyphosate),<br />
<LI jQuery17105684093417750424="154">Spray more often, and<br />
<LI jQuery17105684093417750424="155">Add new herbicides that work through an alternate mode-of-action into their spray programs. </LI></UL><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="156">Each of these responses has, and will continue to contribute to the steady rise in the volume of herbicides applied per acre of HT corn, cotton, and soybeans.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="157">HT crops have increased herbicide use by 527 million pounds over the 16-year period (1996-2011). The incremental increase per year has grown steadily from 1.5 million pounds in 1999, to 18 million five years later in 2003, and 79 million pounds in 2009. In 2011, about 90 million more pounds of herbicides were applied than likely in the absence of HT, or about 24% of total herbicide use on the three crops in 2011.</P><br />
<P jQuery17105684093417750424="158">Today’s major GE crops have increased overall pesticide use by 404 million pounds from 1996 through 2011 (527 million pound increase in herbicides, minus the 123 million pound decrease in insecticides). Overall pesticide use in 2011 was about 20% higher on each acre planted to a GE crop, compared to pesticide use on acres not planted to GE crops.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="159">There are now two-dozen weeds resistant to glyphosate, the major herbicide used on HT crops, and many of these are spreading rapidly. Millions of acres are infested with more than one glyphosate-resistant weed. The presence of resistant weeds drives up herbicide use by 25% to 50%, and increases farmer-weed control costs by at least as much.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="160">The biotechnology-seed-pesticide industry’s primary response to the spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds is development of new HT varieties resistant to multiple herbicides, including 2,4-D and dicamba. These older phenoxy herbicides pose markedly greater human health and environmental risks per acre treated than glyphosate. Approval of corn tolerant of 2,4-D is pending, and could lead to an additional 50% increase in herbicide use per acre on 2,4-D HT corn.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="161">Substantial volumes of Bt toxins are produced per acre planted to Bt corn and cotton. The volumes of these toxins produced by the plants on an acre exceed in nearly all cases the volume of insecticides displaced by the planting of a Bt cultivar. For example, Bt corn targeting the corn rootworm and related soil insects expresses one to two pounds of Bt toxins per acre, while displacing about 0.19 pound of insecticide per acre. The first GE crop expressing eight traits, so-called SmartStax corn, produces 3.7 pounds of Bt toxins per acre and displaces around 0.3 pounds of insecticides.</P><br />
<P jQuery17105684093417750424="162">Reductions in pesticide-related environmental and human health risks have been among the benefits thought to be associated with the shift to glyphosate-based HT crops and Bt corn and cotton. Over the last 16 years, there has been dramatic growth in the volumes of both Bt toxins and glyphosate required to bring crops to harvest. The levels of glyphosate and Bt in the ambient environment, animal feed, and food have markedly increased, creating a myriad of new exposure pathways.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="163">Much new research will be required to translate emerging data on higher exposures to glyphosate and Bt toxins into estimates of human, farm and companion animal, and environmental risks.</P><br />
<H4 jQuery17105684093417750424="164">Important Terms and Definitions</H4><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="165">“Pesticide” is the term used by the U.S. EPA, and pest control experts and scientists, to describe any chemical sprayed or applied to control insects, weeds, plant disease, and rodents. “Pesticide” encompasses herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and fumigants. “Pesticide use” on a given crop refers to the volume of pesticides applied during a production season, either per acre/hectare or across all acres/hectares planted to the crop. Pesticide use is typically measured as the sum of the pounds of herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and other types of pesticides applied.</P><br />
<P jQuery17105684093417750424="166">“Genetically-engineered (GE) crops” have been transformed to express a novel trait using the tools of molecular biology. The new traits in GE crops are derived from a foreign species that is not sexually compatible with the transformed crop (e.g., a bacterium, a fish, an animal, a tree).</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="167">“Herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops” are genetically engineered to withstand the application of specific herbicides over the top of the crop, killing or stunting weed growth, while leaving the crop unharmed.</P><br />
<P jQuery17105684093417750424="168">“Herbicide-resistant weeds” have developed the capacity to withstand or overcome applications of herbicides that once killed or controlled the weed.</P><br />
<P class="" jQuery17105684093417750424="169">“Bt-transgenic (Bt) crops” refer to varieties of corn and cotton genetically engineered to biosynthesize in plant cells one or more protein endotoxins produced by subspecies of the bacterium <EM jQuery17105684093417750424="170">Bacillus thuriengiensis</EM>.</P><br />
<P class="" sizset="0" sizcache09016182573391507="159" jQuery17105684093417750424="171">Full Study:&nbsp;<A class="" href="http://gmoevidence.org/prof-charles-benbrook-gm-crops-increase-herbicide-use/" target=_blank jQuery17105684093417750424="172" _onclick="javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','outbound-article','http://gmoevidence.org']);"><FONT color=#406a15>gmoevidence.org</FONT></A></P><br />
<P class="" sizset="17" sizcache09016182573391507="13" jQuery17105684093417750424="173">Source:&nbsp;<A class="" href="http://cahnrsnews.wsu.edu/2012/10/01/summary-of-major-findings-and-definitions-of-important-terms/" target=_blank jQuery17105684093417750424="174" _onclick="javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','outbound-article','http://cahnrsnews.wsu.edu']);"><FONT color=#406a15>cahnrsnews.wsu.edu</FONT></A><BR><BR>&nbsp;</P></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chsc.or.kr/?post_type=reference&#038;p=3542/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
